Washington, D.C. – Natural Resources Committee Chair Raúl M. Grijalva (D-Ariz.) and Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee Chair Katie Porter (D-Calif.) today made a criminal referral to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) outlining evidence of a likely criminal quid pro quo between Trump administration officials, including former U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) Secretary David Bernhardt, and real estate developer Mike Ingram.

Ingram is the owner of El Dorado Holdings, which proposed to build the Villages at Vigneto (Vigneto), a 28,000-unit housing and commercial development spanning more than 12,000 acres near the endangered San Pedro River in Benson, Arizona. Evidence from the Committee’s investigation strongly suggests that Ingram and several other Arizona donors gave nearly a quarter of a million dollars to the Trump Victory Fund and the Republican National Committee in exchange for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) changing its position about a Clean Water Act permit for Vigneto.

The redacted criminal referral to DOJ is available here: https://bit.ly/37AbiIf

“The findings of this investigation show us yet again that the previous administration cast career staff expertise aside while they handed out federal agency decisions to Trump’s buddies and big donors on a pay-to-play basis,” Chair Grijalva said. “The Villages at Vigneto may not be a household name for many Americans, but to Arizonans, it’s been a looming threat to our fragile desert ecosystem for years. Allowing the development of 28,000 homes, golf courses, resorts, and other commercial buildings to suck the San Pedro River dry during a time of unprecedented drought is nonsensical on its face and agency staff were right to be concerned. It seems Vigneto’s developer figured backroom deals with top Trump officials would be a more fruitful avenue for getting his way—it’s a shame he wasn’t wrong. I strongly urge the Justice Department to take up this investigation and make sure the right people are held accountable for what they’ve done and how they’ve betrayed the trust of the American people.”

“An exchange of money for a specific government action is the clearest form of corruption there is, and Americans—Democrats, Republicans, and Independents—share an understanding that this kind of quid pro quo erodes our democracy,” Rep. Porter said. “In this case, our oversight uncovered that the Trump administration’s Department of the Interior overruled local career professionals and reversed a longstanding position on environmental review requirements, just weeks after politically connected donors made nearly a quarter of a million dollars’ worth of contributions benefiting the Trump campaign. This concerning fact pattern demands additional fact finding, at a minimum, so the American people have answers on whether the Trump administration was acting in the public’s interest or the interests of the highest bidder. We’re calling on the Department of Justice to conduct a thorough investigation and to determine whether criminal charges are appropriate.”

Investigation Background

In April 2019, the Arizona Daily Star’s Tony Davis reported the whistleblower account of Steve Spangle, a now-retired Field Supervisor at FWS’ Arizona office, who claimed he was directed by a “high level politico” to reverse FWS’ position about whether issuance of Clean Water Act permit for Vigneto could potentially have adverse impacts on endangered species or critical habitat. Subsequent reporting revealed that then–Deputy Secretary Bernhardt directed the decision reversal. Spangle noted that he never received such pressure in his more than three decades in public service.

Additional reporting revealed that Dep. Secretary Bernhardt had a private breakfast meeting in Billings, Montana, with Mike Ingram on Aug. 18, 2017, two weeks before Spangle received the phone call directing him to reverse the Vigneto decision. The meeting was not disclosed in Bernhardt’s public calendar or travel documents. Then, on Oct. 6, 2017, Ingram made an unusual out-of-cycle $10,000 donation to the Trump Victory Fund. Less than three weeks later, on Oct. 26, 2017, Spangle officially reversed FWS’ decision on Vigneto.

New Evidence Uncovered in the Committee’s Investigation

The Committee launched an investigation into the Vigneto decision shortly after the incident was publicly reported. Committee staff obtained multiple document productions from DOI and El Dorado, conducted an in-camera review of documents at DOI, questioned then–DOI Chief of Staff Todd Willens, and reviewed Federal Election Commission records.

The Committee’s investigation uncovered several additional pieces of evidence in the case, which now warrants criminal investigation by DOJ: 

• An extensive review of the document productions shows that career officials at FWS, including Spangle and his colleagues in FWS’ Arizona Field Office, FWS’ Regional Office and DOI’s Office of the Solicitor all maintained consensus about FWS’ legal position on Vigneto for more than a decade before Bernhardt demanded that Spangle reverse that position. After being told to reverse the decision, FWS and DOI career employees struggled to credibly defend the new position, citing concerns that it would appear as if it had been “arbitrarily about-faced.”
• Ingram was not the only person who made a large campaign donation on Oct. 6, 2017. Twelve other individuals from Arizona, most of whom have personal or professional connections to Ingram, donated a total of $241,600 to the Trump Victory Fund or the Republican National Committee on or near the same day. All 13 individuals donated in a similar pattern, indicating a coordinated effort. Conspicuously, throughout the entire 2017–2018 election cycle, there were no other days in which more than three people from Arizona donated $2,700 or more to the Trump Victory Fund.
• On the same day as Ingram’s donation, October 6, 2017, the Trump administration announced it would re-evaluate Vigneto’s Clean Water Act permit. There is evidence that Ingram had advance notice of this announcement, giving him time to coordinate the donations.
• Ingram had frequent access to multiple Trump senior officials, including personal email addresses and cell numbers, indicating a high level of influence within the administration.

This is the first time the Committee on Natural Resources has sent a criminal referral to DOJ.

# # #